To bridge the divide between evidence and policy: reduce ambiguity as much as uncertainty
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
4-8-2016
Abstract
Policy makers cannot consider all evidence relevant to policy. They use two shortcuts—emotions and beliefs to understand problems and “rational” ways of establishing the best evidence on solutions—to act quickly in complex, multilevel policy-making environments. Many studies only address one part of this problem. Improving the supply of evidence helps reduce scientific and policy maker uncertainty. However, policy makers also combine their beliefs with limited evidence to reduce ambiguity by choosing one of several possible ways to understand and solve a problem. We use this insight to consider solutions designed to “close the evidence–policy gap.”
Publication Title
Evidence in Public Administration
Recommended Citation
Cairney, P.,
Oliver, K.,
&
Wellstead, A.
(2016).
To bridge the divide between evidence and policy: reduce ambiguity as much as uncertainty.
Evidence in Public Administration,
76(3), 399-402.
http://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12555
Retrieved from: https://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/social-sciences-fp/10
Publisher's Statement
© 2016 by The American Society for Public Administration. Publisher's version of record: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/puar.12555