Business strategy and auditor reporting
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
5-1-2017
Abstract
© 2017, American Accounting Association. All rights reserved. This study examines whether a firm’s business strategy influences auditor reporting. We rely on the organizational literature to develop our prediction that firms utilizing the innovative ‘‘prospector’’ strategy will be more likely than firms utilizing the cost-leadership ‘‘defender’’ strategy to receive both going concern and material weakness opinions. Our empirical evidence supports this prediction. Specifically, we find that, among a sample of financially troubled firms, prospectors are significantly more likely than defenders to receive a going concern opinion. We then analyze a sample of clients who subsequently filed for bankruptcy and find that auditors are less likely to issue going concern opinions to prospector clients. This indicates that auditors commit more Type II errors when auditing prospector clients. We also find that prospectors are significantly more likely than defenders to receive a material weakness opinion. Taken together, the evidence suggests that business strategy is a significant determinant of both going concern and material weakness auditor reporting.
Publication Title
Auditing
Recommended Citation
Chen, Y.,
Eshleman, J.,
&
Soileau, J.
(2017).
Business strategy and auditor reporting.
Auditing,
36(2), 63-86.
http://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-51574
Retrieved from: https://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/michigantech-p/13862