Document Type
Article
Publication Date
5-22-2024
Department
Department of Chemical Engineering; Department of Chemistry; Department of Civil, Environmental, and Geospatial Engineering; College of Business
Abstract
Many actions are underway at global, national, and local levels to increase plastics circularity. However, studies evaluating the environmental and socio-economic impacts of such a transition are lacking at regional levels in the United States. In this work, the existing polyethylene terephthalate and polyolefin plastics supply chains in Michigan were compared to a potential future (‘NextCycle’) scenario that looks at increasing Michigan’s overall recycling rate to 45%. Material flow analysis data was combined with environmental and socio-economic metrics to evaluate the sustainability of these supply chains for the modeled scenarios. Overall, the NextCycle scenario for these supply chains achieved a net 14% and 34% savings of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and energy impacts, when compared with their respective baseline values. Additionally, the NextCycle scenario showed a net gain in employment and wages, however, it showed a net loss of revenue generation outside of Michigan due to the avoided use of virgin resins in Michigan.
Publication Title
Frontiers in Sustainability
Recommended Citation
Chaudhari, U.,
Sedaghatnia, K.,
Reck, B.,
Maguire, K.,
Johnson, A.,
Watkins, D.,
Handler, R. M.,
Hossain, T.,
Hartley, D.,
Thompson, V.,
Peralta, A.,
Apriesnig, J.,
&
Shonnard, D.
(2024).
PET and polyolefin plastics supply chains in Michigan: present and future systems analysis of environmental and socio-economic impacts.
Frontiers in Sustainability,
5.
http://doi.org/10.3389/frsus.2024.1405427
Retrieved from: https://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/michigantech-p2/856
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Version
Publisher's PDF
Included in
Business Commons, Chemical Engineering Commons, Chemistry Commons, Civil and Environmental Engineering Commons
Publisher's Statement
© 2024 Chaudhari, Sedaghatnia, Reck, Maguire, Johnson, Watkins, Handler, Hossain, Hartley, Thompson, Peralta, Apriesnig and Shonnard. Publisher’s version of record: https://doi.org/10.3389/frsus.2024.1405427