Document Type

Article

Publication Date

3-19-2026

Department

College of Forest Resources and Environmental Science; Department of Civil, Environmental, and Geospatial Engineering

Abstract

Because of concentrated connection damage, the impact of sequential hazards on CLT shear wall systems is much more severe than that on traditional concrete and steel structures considering ductile component behaviors. The present paper evaluated the dynamic response of CLT wall structures in wind-only and sequential seismic–wind scenarios and compared the structural dynamic responses and damage levels of different CLT wall systems. The structural models were established separately based on an SOM benchmark structure, a SOFIE project three-story CLT shear wall structure, and a PT CLT wall platform structure from the NHERI Tall Wood project. The equivalent fluctuating wind load was calculated with the ASCE 7 average wind speed, the reference ESDU wind profile, calibrated wind pressure distribution, and simulated fluctuation from the NatHaz Online Wind Simulator. The sequential load was applied to the structural models in the order of seismic excitation, resting time, and then dynamic wind load. The dynamic responses of different CLT wall structures were compared among loading scenarios with increasing seismic and wind intensities. The wind-excited peak story displacement and acceleration for both CLT structures were significantly magnified in the sequential seismic–wind scenarios compared with the wind-only scenarios. The simulation results indicated that the sequential seismic–wind scenarios caused significant acceleration in damaged connections for the conventional CLT shear wall structure. The PT CLT wall structure had minor displacement and acceleration, which were linear to the wind loading factors. For the conventional CLT shear wall structure, the magnification of the acceleration was found to have a strong correlation with the natural frequencies of the damaged structure. This study demonstrated that the wind responses of the PT wall structures were in a safe range after the seismic event, and conventional CLT wall structures need to be re-evaluated under sequential scenarios for structural resilience assessment.

Publisher's Statement

Copyright: © 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. Publisher’s version of record: https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16061213

Publication Title

Buildings

Creative Commons License

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Version

Publisher's PDF

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.