The Philosophical Personality Argument
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
11-2012
Department
Department of Cognitive and Learning Sciences
Abstract
Perhaps personality traits substantially influence one's philosophically relevant intuitions. This suggestion is not only possible, it is consistent with a growing body of empirical research: Personality traits have been shown to be systematically related to diverse intuitions concerning some fundamental philosophical debates. We argue that this fact, in conjunction with the plausible principle that almost all adequate philosophical views should take into account all available and relevant evidence, calls into question some prominent approaches to traditional philosophical projects. To this end, we present the Philosophical Personality Argument (PPA). We explain how it supports the growing body of evidence challenging some of the uses of intuitions in philosophy, and we defend it from some criticisms of empirically based worries about intuitions in philosophy. We conclude that the current evidence indicates that the PPA is sound, and thus many traditional philosophical projects that use intuitions must become substantially more empirically oriented.
Publication Title
Philosophical Studies
Recommended Citation
Feltz, A.,
&
Cokely, E.
(2012).
The Philosophical Personality Argument.
Philosophical Studies,
161(2), 227-246.
http://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-011-9731-4
Retrieved from: https://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/michigantech-p/4987