Title
Patient perceptions of quality: analyzing patient satisfaction surveys
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
8-2015
Abstract
Purpose
– Healthcare facilities are entering an era of increased oversight and heightened expectations concerning both reduced costs and measureable quality. The US Affordable Care Act requires healthcare organizations to collect certain metrics, including patient assessments of quality, in order to monitor and improve the quality of healthcare. These metrics are used as a basis for graduated insurance reimbursements, and are available to consumers as an aid in selecting healthcare providers and insurance plans. The purpose of this paper is to provide healthcare providers with the analytic capabilities to better understand quality of care from the patient’s point of view.
Design/methodology/approach
– This research examines patient satisfaction data from a multi-specialty Medical Practice Group, and uses regression analysis and paired comparisons to provide insight into patient perceptions of care quality.
Findings
– Results show that variables related to Access, Moving Through the Visit, Nurse/Assistant, Care Provider and Personal Issues significantly impact overall assessments of care quality. In addition, while gender and type of care provider do not appear to have an impact on overall patient satisfaction, significant differences do exist based on age group, specialty of the physician and clinic type.
Originality/value
– This study differs from most academic research as it focuses on medical practices, rather than hospitals, and includes multiple clinic types, medical specialties and physician types in the analysis. The study demonstrates how analytics and patient perceptions of quality can inform policy decisions.
Publication Title
International Journal of Operations & Production Management
Recommended Citation
Russell, R. S.,
Johnson, D. M.,
&
White, S. W.
(2015).
Patient perceptions of quality: analyzing patient satisfaction surveys.
International Journal of Operations & Production Management,
35(8), 1158-1181.
http://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-02-2014-0074
Retrieved from: https://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/business-fp/34
Publisher's Statement
© 2015 Emerald Group Publishing Limited. Publisher’s version of record: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-02-2014-0074