Document Type
Article
Publication Date
8-11-2017
Abstract
Energy justice is increasingly being used as a framework to conceptualize the impacts of energy decision making in more holistic ways and to consider the social implications in terms of existing ethical values. Similarly, renewable energy technologies are increasingly being promoted for their environmental and social benefits. However, little work has been done to systematically examine the extent to which, in what ways and in what contexts, renewable energy technologies can contribute to achieving energy justice. This paper assesses the potential of renewable electricity technologies to address energy justice in various global contexts via a systematic review of existing studies analyzed in terms of the principles and dimensions of energy justice. Based on publications including peer reviewed academic literature, books, and in some cases reports by government or international organizations, we assess renewable electricity technologies in both grid integrated and off-grid use contexts. We conduct our investigation through the rubric of the affirmative and prohibitive principles of energy justice and in terms of its temporal, geographic, socio-political, economic, and technological dimensions. Renewable electricity technology development has and continue to have different impacts in different social contexts, and by considering the different impacts explicitly across global contexts, including differences between rural and urban contexts, this paper contributes to identifying and understanding how, in what ways, and in what particular conditions and circumstances renewable electricity technologies may correspond with or work to promote energy justice.
Publication Title
AIMS Energy
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Recommended Citation
Banerjee, A.,
Prehoda, E.,
Sidortsov, R.,
&
Schelly, C.
(2017).
Renewable, ethical? Assessing the energy justice potential of renewable electricity.
AIMS Energy,
5(5), 768-797.
http://doi.org/10.3934/energy.2017.5.768
Retrieved from: https://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/social-sciences-fp/108
Version
Publisher's PDF
Publisher's Statement
© 2017, Chelsea Schelly, et al., licensee AIMS Press. Article deposited here in compliance with publisher policies. Publisher's version of record: https://dx.doi.org/10.3934/energy.2017.5.768